Wolfram · Collatz · Mahler Contributors to this project / Author's other works: cadencevideoplayer.com

Collatz · ¥120 million

Collatz: halve it, or triple it and add one

Take a positive whole number. If it is even, halve it; if it is odd, triple it and add one. Repeat. Lothar Collatz guessed in 1937 that every start eventually reaches 1. Every start below 271, about 2.4 sextillion, has been checked by computer on supercomputers across Europe. Terence Tao proved in 2019 that almost every orbit reaches almost bounded values. Yet nobody can prove it for every single start. The Japanese company Bakuage offers ¥120 million for a proof or a disproof.

Seen

The orbit of the chosen start, step by step, on a doubling scale: the height is the number's size in binary digits. The start 27 climbs to 9,232 before it falls to 1, after 111 steps. The dashed line is the start itself: the first step below it is the stopping time.
The same orbit as a coin, until it reaches 1: black where the number is odd, in the compressed form T(n) = n/2 or (3n + 1)/2 that the theory uses (at most 160 steps shown).

Stated

The conjecture

For every integer n ≥ 1, some iterate of n under n ↦ n/2 (n even), 3n + 1 (n odd) equals 1. Equivalently, every start has a finite stopping time: its orbit eventually drops below where it began.

Known in the world

Computation. Bařina's distributed verification passed 271 in January 2025, on thousands of workers across European supercomputers. Almost all. Terras (1976) showed that almost every start has a finite stopping time. Tao (2019) showed that almost every orbit falls below any function tending to infinity. Every start is the open part, and it is what the prize pays for.

What our record adds (measured; the counting form)

Count the w-bit numbers whose orbit stays at or above its start for T steps. The first w − 1 steps are free: each pattern of parities belongs to exactly one residue of the start (Terras's bijection), so they pay exactly. Past the free bits, the count follows Terras's coin model to 0.5% at every width to 30 bits, and keeps the coin's rate at every width measured, to 43 bits, with a bounded excess over the coin (at most 7.4 bits, with no upward trend). That is a precise target. If fewer than 2w − αT + c numbers of w bits stay up for T steps, for fixed α and c, every stopping time is finite and the conjecture follows. The free part is a theorem. The rest is the open part, a statement about each orbit's binary digits, not about almost all of them.

The twin of Rule 30

Multiplying by three is the same linear step as Rule 30, plus carries (the carry of Rule 30). In both problems a free part pays exactly and the remaining part pays at the coin's rate, as far as anyone can measure. Collatz has an avenue that Rule 30 lacks: after the free bits the state is an explicit integer, a remainder modulo a power of three. Some of our lemmas are known results in new clothes, and we credit them: the window principle's complexity bound is Dubickas (2009).

Sources. COLLATZ-PRIZE.md (the honest summary and sections 1 to 6; probes in tests/probes/prizes/); D. Bařina, Improved verification limit for the convergence of the Collatz conjecture, J. Supercomputing 81 (2025); R. Terras, Acta Arith. 30 (1976); T. Tao, Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values (2019); the prize under Bakuage's rules (PRIZE-PROBLEMS.md section 1).

Compute is not the bottleneck

Collatz has had supercomputers: 271 starts checked, 256 times the 263 our laptop reached for Mahler. No counterexample is expected within any reachable search, and none was found. A proof needs the idea that turns "every start checked so far" into "every start", and no amount of hardware supplies it.

Where to go next